A frequently given piece of advice for writers is to avoid long
sentences. It’s one of the pieces of advice that I have always
completely disregarded, as being obviously wrong: the thing to avoid
is not long sentences, but complicated sentences. A sentence that is
long can still be quite simple, if it doesn’t require the reader to
remember previous parts of the sentence in order to parse the rest.
Instead, each part of the sentence just extends the thought made in
the previous one, with appropriate punctuation that shows the
relationship between the two; a sentence of that sort can go on for
many lines without confusing anyone. What is confusing is when a
sentence does something like requiring the reader to remember which
verb was used back forty words previously, before the sentence went
off on a tangent. And the cure for such sentences is never as simple
as just bisecting them. Often one can rearrange them to bring
together the separated pieces of an idea; but if that doesn’t work,
one has to drop the idea and then explicitly take it up again when one
later comes back to it. Or, more brutally, one can axe the tangential
remark; not everything needs to be said – or if it does need to be
said, maybe it can be said somewhere else.